CLOSED IRAQ INQUIRY ‘TOTALLY INADEQUATE’

PRIVATE SESSIONS WILL NOT PROVIDE THE ANSWERS SO BADLY NEEDED

SNP Westminster Leader and Defence Spokesperson, Angus Robertson MP, has branded the UK Government’s inquiry into the war in Iraq in closed session as “totally inadequate” and warned that it will not provide the answers so badly needed.

The SNP have led demands for an inquiry into the Iraq war, and secured the first substantive debate in October 2006 – at that time the vote was narrowly lost by just 25 votes – with 12 Labour rebels. It was backed by all Tories and Liberal Democrats.

Mr Robertson said:

“As he reinvented himself last week, Gordon Brown told us he was committed to transparency in government. Today, the doors he was so keen to open have been slammed shut in the faces of our service personnel, the families who lost loved ones in Iraq, those people who protested against the war, and all of us who are paying for it.

“The claim that the war was about weapons of mass destruction was a blatant lie, a mere cover story unsupported by the facts, which has cost the lives of thousands of civilians and hundreds of our brave soldiers. The timing and scope of this inquiry all point to a desperate Government and a Prime Minister making a cynical attempt to boost his faltering leadership.

“We must learn the lessons from the worst UK Foreign policy decision in living memory and this can only be done through a full and open investigation - that this inquiry will take place in private is totally outrageous and entirely inadequate.

“The SNP have been pressing for years on this issue, and will continue to push until the full story about the events which led to the war in Iraq and the conflict itself are known.”

Clegg: Response to Iraq inquiry announcement

Nick Clegg response to the announcement of an secret Iraq inquiry.

I passionately believe we were wrong to invade Iraq but I am second to none in my admiration for the bravery and dedication of our service men and women.

Everyone knows that the invasion of Iraq was the biggest foreign policy mistake this country has made in generations; the single most controversial decision taken by government since Suez.

So Mr Speaker, I am staggered that the Prime Minister is today seeking to compound that error, fatal for so many of Britain's sons and daughters, by covering up the path that led to it.

Liberal Democrats have called for an inquiry into the build-up and conduct of the Iraq war for many years, and we can be grateful that finally, the Prime Minister has acceded to that demand. But, as so often, he has taken a step in the right direction but missed the fundamental point.

A secret inquiry will not deliver what Britain needs. Does the Prime Minister not understand that the purpose of an inquiry is not just to produce a set of dry conclusions, but to allow the people of Britain to come to terms with a mistake made in our name?

To allow veterans, and the families and friends of those who gave their lives in this disastrous war, to come to understand how it happened? I have met the families of these soldiers. And just an hour ago I was asked to speak in their name and tell you that nothing short of a fully public inquiry - held in the open - will satisfy them.

Will the Prime Minister not listen to what they need? He says it the inquiry has to be in private to protect national security. But it looks suspiciously like he wants to protect his reputation and that of his predecessor, not Britain. Why else would he want it to report after the general election? It is perfectly possible to have particular sensitive sessions in camera while retaining the fundamental principle that this inquiry should be open to all.

I am grateful that he has listened to my representations and extended the inquiry to cover the origins of the war. And to give it full access to the documents and files it will need. But I am disappointed he made such a feeble attempt to secure consensus on the panel that will conduct the inquiry.

The experience of successfully established inquiries like the one being held in the Netherlands shows that consensus can be secured if the government conducts painstaking consultation. Why did the Prime Minister not even attempt that sort of constructive discussion?

The Government must not be allowed to close the book on this war as it opened it: in secrecy. Last week he stood there and spoke eloquently about the need for more public accountability and transparency. This was his first test. He has failed. He chose secrecy instead.

For six years, we have watched our brave service men and women putting their lives on the line for a war we did not support and cannot understand. To rebuild public trust, the inquiry must be held in public. Will the Prime Minister, even now, reconsider? Will he make this inquiry a healing process or will he continue to deny the British people's legitimate demands?